In the same way the chief priests also, along with the scribes and elders, were mocking him, saying, ‘He saved others; he cannot save himself.* He is the King of Israel; let him come down from the cross now, and we will believe in him. He trusts in God; let God deliver him now, if he wants to; for he said, “I am God’s Son.” 4243 44 (Mt. 27:41-43)
'Let's see him try that now!' 'Yeah, let's see what he can do now!' It's the jibe they glibly banter among themselves, in staged voices, no doubt projected for his ears. All the while they also refer to him in the third person as if he weren't there. Ironically, the fact that he is stuck there rallies and delights them.
"Now" is their condition. By now they also mean 'finally, now it's our turn!' But that still isn't enough to satisfy them. So after disparaging Jesus for not miracling on cue, after slighting him, they bypass him altogether. Heady with power, they go over his head to appeal to God's very self.
Let God deliver him now, if he wants to. Still now, of course. Yes, it should be now. It must be now...
What they claim as if they know it all, will, in time, come true in ways they cannot now imagine.
Their timing is way off. "He saved others," they taunt, perhaps unconsciously using past tense, surely assuming he was finished with that. Yet, saving others is precisely what Jesus is doing now -- yes, now.
When you think of it, the mocking phrase, "let God deliver him" was probably also the whispered prayer of the weeping women that day. And "if he wants to" is not so far from "Thy will be done," is it? By God's grace, in God's time, redemption comes and sets life right.
Pastor Shirley
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Friday, December 17, 2010
Numbers of things...
God is not human, that he should lie,
not a human being, that he should change his mind.
Does he speak and then not act?
Does he promise and not fulfill? (Numbers 23:19)
God is not... We can fill in the end of that sentence if we're ready to admit who we are, what we're like. We are "People of the Lie" as M. Scott Peck pointed out in his book by that title. To lie is the basic sin act, I think. Perhaps the old traditional list is correct when it names pride, sloth, and the rest as the seven deadly sins, but lying is how those show up. Lying is the shield those sins strut behind in order to remain anonymous and safe and maintain the illusion that they are clever choices. We lie, but God is not like us.
God does not lie. There's a lifetime of reflection in that short sentence, isn't there? A modern conversation starter in all visioning meetings, whether in churches, businesses or personal growth groups, begins with this question: what would you do if there were no limitations? Consultants know that we blame our limits for holding us back; we use them as excuses. If we had no limitations, they reason, then we would be free to clarify our goals, we would become all we hope to be, go where we want to go, do what we want to do and finally be satisfied with the experience of living or working. We would accomplish much more expansive goals. For a few moments, we join in and imagine differently. But would we recognize a limit when we tripped over it? What really limits our lives? What keeps us from joy, from receiving loving care, from being wasted when we fail, from death itself? God does not lie. But we believe legions of lies from other directions and of our own making to justify not trusting him.
God does not change his mind. Well, I've met more than a few people who propose to be godly in that way! Down here, we call that stubbornness. In God, it's great faithfulness. What's the difference? The does-not-lie part (see above). Lies squirm and camouflage themselves like chameleons to avoid being discovered. They stretch themselves thin, hoping to be swept under the rug, unnoticed. Truth is like salt, you can taste it if it's in there. Truth is like strong light shining from a hilltop. Truth has integrity as in the very person of Jesus. Truth doesn't change.
Now comes the quiz on what we've learned. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill? It's a no-brainer, as we say. Rhetorical. No need to fill in the blanks. But there's still a large essay question remaining and lots of empty space in which to write your answer. What comes next? How does knowing this, believing this, now shape your life?
I write.
SH
not a human being, that he should change his mind.
Does he speak and then not act?
Does he promise and not fulfill? (Numbers 23:19)
God is not... We can fill in the end of that sentence if we're ready to admit who we are, what we're like. We are "People of the Lie" as M. Scott Peck pointed out in his book by that title. To lie is the basic sin act, I think. Perhaps the old traditional list is correct when it names pride, sloth, and the rest as the seven deadly sins, but lying is how those show up. Lying is the shield those sins strut behind in order to remain anonymous and safe and maintain the illusion that they are clever choices. We lie, but God is not like us.
God does not lie. There's a lifetime of reflection in that short sentence, isn't there? A modern conversation starter in all visioning meetings, whether in churches, businesses or personal growth groups, begins with this question: what would you do if there were no limitations? Consultants know that we blame our limits for holding us back; we use them as excuses. If we had no limitations, they reason, then we would be free to clarify our goals, we would become all we hope to be, go where we want to go, do what we want to do and finally be satisfied with the experience of living or working. We would accomplish much more expansive goals. For a few moments, we join in and imagine differently. But would we recognize a limit when we tripped over it? What really limits our lives? What keeps us from joy, from receiving loving care, from being wasted when we fail, from death itself? God does not lie. But we believe legions of lies from other directions and of our own making to justify not trusting him.
God does not change his mind. Well, I've met more than a few people who propose to be godly in that way! Down here, we call that stubbornness. In God, it's great faithfulness. What's the difference? The does-not-lie part (see above). Lies squirm and camouflage themselves like chameleons to avoid being discovered. They stretch themselves thin, hoping to be swept under the rug, unnoticed. Truth is like salt, you can taste it if it's in there. Truth is like strong light shining from a hilltop. Truth has integrity as in the very person of Jesus. Truth doesn't change.
Now comes the quiz on what we've learned. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill? It's a no-brainer, as we say. Rhetorical. No need to fill in the blanks. But there's still a large essay question remaining and lots of empty space in which to write your answer. What comes next? How does knowing this, believing this, now shape your life?
I write.
SH
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Advent 2010
“this will be a sign for you...” (Luke 2:12)
Even a little child knows
that babies should be wrapped in cloths.
So, while the shepherds were wondering
about the angel hosts
and Mary was pondering
what had just happened,
as a little child, I was worrying about that sign,
worrying that these shepherds
might not find him with those directions.
Probably not that many babies were lying in mangers,
even in Bethlehem that night,
even with all the visitors,
I reassured myself.
Yet, wouldn't they have to search a lot of stables?
Couldn't at least one angel go with them,
and hover above the nativity
with a scrolling “Gloria”?
Wouldn't a star be a better sign?
Maybe a comet with a long,
downward-streaking arrow for a tail.
Or shouldn't there be halos, like in the paintings,
so he and his mother would
stand out in the crowd?
No -- even a worried child
suspects that would not do,
suspects that was not what God was doing.
Was it a miracle they found him,
Even 'though he looked like
a regular, little child,
Even 'though he himself
had to be the sign
of what God was doing?
Or, I wondered,
might it happen again, just that way,
even for a regular little child
looking for what God was doing
on any regular day?
"this child is set...for a sign" (Luke 2:34) SH
Even a little child knows
that babies should be wrapped in cloths.
So, while the shepherds were wondering
about the angel hosts
and Mary was pondering
what had just happened,
as a little child, I was worrying about that sign,
worrying that these shepherds
might not find him with those directions.
Probably not that many babies were lying in mangers,
even in Bethlehem that night,
even with all the visitors,
I reassured myself.
Yet, wouldn't they have to search a lot of stables?
Couldn't at least one angel go with them,
and hover above the nativity
with a scrolling “Gloria”?
Wouldn't a star be a better sign?
Maybe a comet with a long,
downward-streaking arrow for a tail.
Or shouldn't there be halos, like in the paintings,
so he and his mother would
stand out in the crowd?
No -- even a worried child
suspects that would not do,
suspects that was not what God was doing.
Was it a miracle they found him,
Even 'though he looked like
a regular, little child,
Even 'though he himself
had to be the sign
of what God was doing?
Or, I wondered,
might it happen again, just that way,
even for a regular little child
looking for what God was doing
on any regular day?
"this child is set...for a sign" (Luke 2:34) SH
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)